Options Part #1 (Read 1,217 times)

[Giants]

I voted for no changes however the majority of owners did vote for some sort of changes and this is what we have. If that has since changed, I'm okay with another poll being done, but I don't think everyone will happy no matter what the outcome.

[Deleted]

I think it's funny that one of the people responsible for the high bids is complaining about them.

[Deleted]

Did I bid $100 on a player? Or even half of that?

[Deleted]

Ok so this whole thing was brought on by A's saying he did not like players being bid so high, and Indians say he was thinking of quitting the league due to not being able to keep guys he liked because of the high bids.
Now Indians does not vote and A's does not like the ideas that have been voted on by the league.
So I would really like to know just what the A's and Indians are wanting? Also if teams are not allowed to bid what they are willing to pay to get new players, just how do you propose teams get new players and improve their teams?
If you are going to say trades and UFA then why do we need RFA we could just have a full roster keeper league.

[Deleted]

This league makes me giggle.

starecat.com/content/wp-content/uploads/who-wants-change-who-wants-to-change.jpg

[Deleted]

I asked for a change to an RFA not going $100 that is all. $75 cap, etc. I picked up a bottom barrel team when I started and been in playoffs every year. How many RFA have I stolen for $50+? Zero? Same with Nats. So if you think you can only build by stealing RFA, you are lying to yourself.

[Deleted]

I'm hoping no self raises on rf.'s and the options limit bid over all prices for those that wanted it. we will stick it out this season and can consider removing it next year if needed

[Deleted]

That a fine with league thinks is best. I honestly just want to play at this point.